Implementasi Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Praktik Peradilan = The Implementation Of Arbitral Award Annulment In Judicial Practice

Pasaribu, Hetty Maria (2026) Implementasi Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Praktik Peradilan = The Implementation Of Arbitral Award Annulment In Judicial Practice. S2 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Kata_Pengantar_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak) HalJudulKataPengantarDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (5MB)
Preview	Text (BAB_I) BabI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (472kB) | Preview
	Text (BAB_II) BabII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (586kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BabIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (470kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BabIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (484kB)
	Text (BAB_V) BabV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (339kB)
Preview	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (357kB) | Preview

Abstract

Penelitian ini berusaha mengidentifikasi prosedur pembatalan putusan arbitrase lewat peradilan serta kerangka hukum yang mengaturnya. Penulis memakai teori hukum Gustav Radbruch teori keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan akibat hukum sebagai instrumen untuk menelaah dan menjelaskan mekanisme pembatalan putusan arbitrase, jenis‑jenis upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh, serta konsekuensi hukumnya. Dengan pendekatan ini, penulis dapat menilai bahwa suatu putusan dapat diajukan permohonan pembatalan berdasarkan alasan‑alasan yang diatur perundang‑undangan serta mengetahui langkah‑langkah hukum yang dapat diambil dan dampak hukumnya. Metode yang dipakai adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yang mengumpulkan sumber hukum dengan merujuk pada norma‑norma dalam peraturan perundang‑undangan, putusan‑putusan pengadilan, serta kebiasaan masyarakat. Sumber hukum yang dianalisis meliputi bahan primer dokumen otoritatif seperti undang‑undang, catatan resmi, risalah perundang‑undangan, dan keputusan hakim—dan bahan sekunder, yaitu publikasi non‑resmi seperti buku teks, kamus hukum, jurnal, serta komentar atas putusan pengadilan. Berdasarkan temuan, penulis menyimpulkan bahwa putusan arbitrase bersifat final dan mengikat para pihak. Namun, pembatalan dapat diajukan bila tiga syarat yang tercantum dalam Pasal 70 Undang‑Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa terpenuhi. Karena merupakan perkara perdata khusus, tidak ada upaya banding ke Pengadilan Tinggi; istilah “banding” sebenarnya mengacu pada kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung, yang dalam Pasal 72 ayat 4 disebut sebagai upaya hukum pertama dan terakhir. Menurut Surat Edaran Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Implementasi Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung 2016 sebagai pedoman bagi pengadilan, apabila Pengadilan Negeri menolak permohonan pembatalan putusan arbitrase, tidak tersedia lagi upaya hukum baik banding maupun peninjauan kembali./ This study attempts to identify the procedure for annulling an arbitral award through the courts and the legal framework governing it. The author uses Gustav Radbruch's legal theory—the theory of justice, legal certainty, and legal consequences—as an instrument to examine and explain the mechanism for annulling an arbitral award, the types of legal remedies available, and their legal consequences. Using this approach, the author can assess whether an annulment request for an award can be submitted based on the grounds stipulated in law, as well as identify the legal steps that can be taken and their legal impact. The method used is normative legal research, which compiles legal sources by referring to norms in statutory regulations, court decisions, and social customs. The legal sources analyzed include primary materials—authoritative documents such as laws, official records, legal treatises, and judicial decisions—and secondary materials, namely non-official publications such as textbooks, legal dictionaries, journals, and commentaries on court decisions. Based on the findings, the author concludes that the arbitration award is final and binding on the parties. However, an annulment can be requested if the three conditions stipulated in Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution are met. Because it is a special civil case, there is no appeal to the High Court; the term "appeal" actually refers to cassation to the Supreme Court, which in Article 72 paragraph 4 is stated as the first and final legal remedy. According to Circular Letter Number 4 of 2016 concerning the Implementation of the Results of the 2016 Plenary Meeting of the Supreme Court Chamber as a guideline for the courts, if the District Court rejects the application for annulment of the arbitration award, no further legal remedies are available, either an appeal or a judicial review.

Actions (login required)

View Item