Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Mitra Pengemudi Grab terhadap Praktik Open Suspend dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Studi atas Putusan Nomor 13/KPPU-I/2019 jo. Putusan Nomor 468/Pdt.P/2020/PN Jkt.Sel jo. Putusan Nomor 485 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021)

Simarmata, Gamaliel Reynova Jevonsius (2026) Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Mitra Pengemudi Grab terhadap Praktik Open Suspend dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Studi atas Putusan Nomor 13/KPPU-I/2019 jo. Putusan Nomor 468/Pdt.P/2020/PN Jkt.Sel jo. Putusan Nomor 485 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (HalJudulDaftarIsiDaftarLampiranAbstrak) HalJudulDaftarIsiDaftarLampiranAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (15MB)
	Text (BABI) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (20MB)
	Text (BABII) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (19MB)
	Text (BABIII) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (25MB)
	Text (BABIV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (26MB)
	Text (BABV) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (3MB)
	Text (DaftarPustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (6MB)
	Text (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (23MB)

Abstract

Perkembangan transportasi berbasis aplikasi seperti Grab menimbulkan hubungan kemitraan yang masih menyisakan persoalan, terutama dalam praktik open suspend yang dapat membatasi akses mitra terhadap aplikasi dan sumber penghasilan. Rumusan masalah dalam skripsi ini adalah bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi mitra pengemudi terhadap praktik open suspend dalam perspektif hukum persaingan usaha dan perjanjian kemitraan, serta bagaimana penerapan hak pembelaan mitra pengemudi berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 13/KPPU-I/2019 jo. Putusan Nomor 468/Pdt.P/2020/PN Jkt.Sel jo. Putusan Nomor 485 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Data yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer, yaitu KUHPerdata, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008, Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 12 Tahun 2019, serta putusan-putusan terkait. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi mitra pengemudi belum optimal karena hubungan kemitraan belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan asas kesetaraan, itikad baik, dan saling menguntungkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2008. Penerapan hak pembelaan berdasarkan putusan yang dikaji menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan open suspend dinilai melalui pendekatan rule of reason, namun masih diperlukan mekanisme keberatan yang transparan, adil, dan efektif untuk menjamin perlindungan hak mitra pengemudi. / The development of app-based transportation services such as Grab has created partnership relationships that still raise legal issues, particularly regarding the practice of open suspension, which may restrict drivers' access to the application and their source of income. The issues examined in this study are the legal protection for Grab driver-partners against the practice of open suspension from the perspectives of competition law and partnership agreements, and the implementation of drivers' right to defense based on Decision Number 13/KPPU-I/2019 in conjunction with Decision Number 468/Pdt.P/2020/PN Jkt.Sel and Decision Number 485 K/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2021. This research is a normative legal study employing both the statutory approach and the case approach. The data used consist of secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, including the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 5 of 1999, Law Number 20 of 2008, Minister of Transportation Regulation Number 12 of 2019, as well as the relevant court decisions. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for driver-partners remains inadequate because the partnership relationship has not fully reflected the principles of equality, good faith, and mutual benefit as stipulated in Law Number 20 of 2008. Furthermore, the implementation of the right to defense based on the decisions examined demonstrates that the open suspension policy was assessed using the rule of reason approach; however, a more transparent, fair, and effective objection mechanism is still required to ensure legal certainty and protect the rights of driver-partners.

Actions (login required)

View Item