Penerapan Rehabilitasi dan Pemidanaan Terhadap Terdakwa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Militer II – 08 NO. 80-K/PM II - 08/AD/IV/2020)

Prasetio, Saut Agung Tony Raja (2024) Penerapan Rehabilitasi dan Pemidanaan Terhadap Terdakwa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Militer II – 08 NO. 80-K/PM II - 08/AD/IV/2020). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak) HalJudulAbstrakDaftarisiDaftarGambarDaftarTabelDaftarlampiran.pdf.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (815kB)
	Text (BAB_I) BABI.pdf.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (379kB)
	Text (BAB_II) BABII.pdf.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (511kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BABIII.pdf.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (391kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BABIV.pdf.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (478kB)
	Text (BAB_V) BABV.pdf.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (319kB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (207kB)
	Text (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (560kB)

Abstract

Hasil penelitian yang ditemukan penulis bahwa pertama, Penerapan hukum pidana materiil berdasarkan putusan perkara Nomor. 80-K/PM II - 08/AD/IV/2020)PM Jakarta Timur dakwaan yang didakwakan kepada terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana yang di atur dalam Pasal 127 ayat (1) huruf a Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika yaitu “Setiap Penyalahguna Narkotika Golongan I bagi diri sendiri”. dimana unsur-unsur dalam dakwaan tersebut telah dianggap terpenuhi. Dalam putusan perkara Nomor. 80-K/PM II - 08/AD/IV/2020 Jakarta timur ini peneliti tidak sependapat dengan pemecatan tanpa memerintahkan terdakwa untuk menjalani rehabilitasi karena fakta persidangan terdakwa sudah berulang kali menggunakan narkotika dan terdakwa akan merasa badan segar dan fresh ketika telah menggunakan sabu-sabu dengan kata lain terdakwa sudah menjadi pecandu pemula dan sudah memasuki tahap ketergantungan kepada sabu-sabu. Kedua, Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusannya melihat beberapa faktor yaitu dari segi yuridis (dakwaan Oditur Militer, keterangan terdakwa, keterangan saksi dan pasal-pasal dalam undang-undang yang terkait dengan tindak pidana narkotika) dan non yuridis (latar belakang terdakwa, akibat perbuatan terdakwa dan kondisi terdakwa) yang dapat memberatkan atau meringankan terdakwa sesuai dengan teori keadlian menurut Aristoteles dalam memutus perkara yang seadil-adilnya bagi pelaku. / The results of the research found by the author that first, the application of material criminal law based on the decision in case Number. 80-K/PM II - 08/AD/IV/2020)PM East Jakarta The charges against the defendant were legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act as regulated in Article 127 paragraph (1) letter a of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, namely "Every Class I Narcotics Abuser for himself". where the elements in the indictment have been deemed fulfilled. In the decision in case No. 80-K/PM II - 08/AD/IV/2020 East Jakarta. This researcher does not agree with dismissal without ordering the defendant to undergo rehabilitation due to the fact that at trial the defendant had repeatedly used narcotics and the defendant would feel refreshed and invigorated when he had used methamphetamine. methamphetamine, in other words the defendant has become a novice addict and has entered the stage of dependence on methamphetamine. Second, the judge in handing down his decision looks at several factors, namely from a juridical perspective (military prosecutor's indictment, the defendant's statement, witness statements and articles in the law related to narcotics crimes) and non-juridical (the defendant's background, the consequences of the defendant's actions and condition of the defendant) which can aggravate or mitigate the defendant in accordance with Aristotle's theory of justice in deciding cases as fairly as possible for the perpetrator.

Actions (login required)

View Item