Halawa, Rogate Oktoberius (2023) Penerbitan Sertifikat Ganda Merek Super Mario Bros di Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan Intelektual (Studi Kasus Nomor 650 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021). S2 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak)
Hal_Judul__Kata_Pengantar_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (946kB) |
|
Text (BAB_I)
BAB_I.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (834kB) |
|
Text (BAB_II)
BAB_II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (842kB) |
|
Text (BAB_III)
BAB_III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (879kB) |
|
Text (BAB_IV)
BAB_IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB) |
|
Text (BAB_V)
BAB_V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (544kB) |
|
Text (Daftar_Pustaka)
Daftar_Pustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (696kB) |
|
Text (Lampiran)
Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (8MB) |
Abstract
Setiap merek haruslah terlindungi dengan mengajukan permohonan pendaftaran merek di Direkorat Jendral Kekayaan Intelektual Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. Sama halnya dengan merek Super Mario Bros yang dimohonkan pendaftaran mereknya oleh dua pihak yang berbeda sehingga kedua merek yang sama dan tidak sejenis tersebut terlindungi dan masing-masing mendapatkan hak ekslusif dari negara. Dengan demikian perlu adanya kajian hukum dari segi teori Lawrence M Friedman tentang sistem hukum dan juga dari sudut teori kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan serta keadilan dan terhadap teori Critical Legal Studies untuk mempertajam analisa terhadap pemberlakuan undang-undang merek tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang dilakukan untuk mendapatkan data yang diperlukan sehubungan dengan permasalahan. Data yang diambil dalam melakukan penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tertier. Untuk mendukung data tersebut maka dilakukan wawancara langsung dengan Direktur Direktorat Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia yang beralamat di Jl. HR. Rasuna Said, Kavling 8-9, Jakarta Selatan. Untuk analisis data dilakukan dengan melalui pendekatan secara analisis kualitatif. Dari hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa permohonan pendaftaran merek super mario bros di Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan Intelektual terdapat dua pemohon yaitu Nintendo Co., Ltd pada tahun 1986 dan Eddy Tumewu yang memohonkan pendaftaran pada tahun 1994. Permohonan kedua merek yang sama dengan kelas berbeda tersebut diterima dikarenakan pada saat dimohonkan tidak bertentangan dengan Undang-undang Nomor 21 Tahun 1961 tentang Merek Perusahaan dan Merek Perniagaan dan Undang-undang nomor 19 Tahun 1992 tentang merek karena tidak ada pemohon pendaftar yang sejenis terhadap merek tersebut. Akan tetapi pada putusan mahkamah agung membatalkan merek super mario bros yang dimohonkan oleh Eddy Tumewu dengan hanya mempertimbangkan karena faktor merek terkenal dan mengesampingkan asas non retroaktif. Kata Kunci : Penerbitan Sertifikat merek, merek yang sama dan sejenis, merek yang sama dengan kelas yang berbeda, super mario bros, merek terkenal. / Thesis Title : Issuance of Dual Certificate of Super Mario Bros Trademark at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (Case Study Number 650 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021) Every brand must be protected by registering for a trademark at the Directorate General of Intellectual Property of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia. One of the said brands Super Mario Bros brand, applied for trademark registration by two parties. Therefore, both parties of similar brands but not quite the same are protected, and each receives exclusive rights from the state. Thus, it is necessary to research further on this issue from the legal studies framework by adopting Lawrence M Friedman's theory of the legal system, as well as the theory of legal certainty, expediency, and justice and the theory of Critical Legal Studies to sharpen the analysis of the enactment of the trademark law. The method used in this research is normative juridical, which is carried out to obtain the necessary data concerning the problem. The data taken in conducting this research is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. To support the data, direct interviews were conducted with the Director of the Directorate of Trademarks and Geographical Indications of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights located at Jl. HR. Rasuna Said, Kavling 8-9, South Jakarta. The data analysis is done through a qualitative analysis approach. According to the research, in the application for registration of The Super Mario Bros brand in the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, there are two applicants, namely Nintendo Co., Ltd. in 1986 and Eddy Tumewu, who applied for registration in 1994. The application of the identical two trademarks with different classes was accepted. At the time of application, it is not against Act No. 21 year 1961 on Company Trademarks and Brands and Act No. 19 year 1992 on trademarks as there is no similar applicant registrant against the brand. However, the decision of the Supreme Court canceled the super mario bros trademark applied for by Eddy Tumewu by only considering because of the well-known trademark factor and overriding the principle of non-retroactivity. Keywords: Issuance of a trademark certificate, the same brand of the exact identification, identical trademark with a different class, super mario bros, famous trademark.
Item Type: | Thesis (S2) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||
Subjects: | LAW LAW > Religious law in general. Comparative religious law. Jurisprudence > Legal systems compared LAW > Religious law in general. Comparative religious law. Jurisprudence > Interdisciplinary discussion of subjects > Public property. Government property |
||||||||||||
Divisions: | PROGRAM PASCASARJANA > Magister Ilmu Hukum | ||||||||||||
Depositing User: | Mr Rogate Oktoberius Halawa | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 07 Jul 2023 08:53 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 07 Jul 2023 08:53 | ||||||||||||
URI: | http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/11716 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |