Tinjauan Yuridis Interpretasi Hakim Terkait Klausula Baku Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Kasus Putusan Perdata Nomor 53/Pdt.G/2016/PN Jakarta Pusat)

Lusita, Lusita (2022) Tinjauan Yuridis Interpretasi Hakim Terkait Klausula Baku Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Kasus Putusan Perdata Nomor 53/Pdt.G/2016/PN Jakarta Pusat). S2 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

[img] Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Daftar_Gambar_Daftar_Tabel_Daftar_Lampiran_Abstrak)
HalJudulDaftarisiDaftarGambarDaftarTabelDaftarLampiranAbstrak.pdf.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (694kB)
[img] Text (BAB_I)
BABI.PDF
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (160kB)
[img] Text (BAB_II)
BABII.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (232kB)
[img] Text (BAB_III)
BABIII.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (195kB)
[img] Text (BAB_IV)
BABIV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (191kB)
[img] Text (BAB_V)
BABV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (67kB)
[img] Text (Daftar_Pustaka)
DaftarPustaka.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (335kB)

Abstract

Perjanjian baku yang memuat klausula baku yang pada awalnya diterapkan dalam kegiatan bisnis dengan tujuan untuk menunjang efisiensi dan efektivitas, pada perkembangannya dianggap berpotensi atau telah berbenturan dengan keseimbangan para pihak dalam perjanjian dan melanggar asas-asas hukum perjanjian atau hukum kontrak yang berl aku di Indonesia. Rumusan masalah 1).Bagaimanakah interpretasi hakim terkait klausula baku menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlind uii gan Konsumen ? 2). Bagaimanakah penerapan kl ausul baku terhadap konsumen dikaitkan dengan Putusan Hakim Pengadi1an Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 53/Pdt. G/20 1 6 tanggal 1 4 Juni 2016. Metode Penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan cara menel iti bahan pustaka atau d ata sekun der belaka. Kerangka teori yan g digunakan teori per lindungan hukum serta teori ke adilan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian di pero leh bahwa undang undang perlind ungan konsumen telah memberikan Batasan bagi pelaku usaha terkait penerapan klausuIa baku dan terkait putusan hakim yang memutus sengketa terkait penggunaan klausula baku oleh pelaku usaha masih belum berpihak kepada konsumen dan mengabatkan undang-undang perlindungan konsumen./ The standard agreement contafning the standard Clauses origfno//) applied in business activities with the aim ofsupporting efficiency and effectiveness, fn its development is considei’ed potential or has clashed wfth the balance of the parties to the agreement and vfolutes the prfncfples of treaty law ot’ contract law opplicuble in Indonesfa. Problem formulatfOn! 1). What is the yudge’s interpretntfon of the stundurd clause undet’ Law No. 8 of 1999 on Coiuiumer Pt’otection? 2). How i,i’ the application of the standard clawe to conswners associated with the Decision of the C.’entral Jakarta DfStFict Court Judge No.53 / Pdt.G / 2016 dated June I4, 2016. The theoretical framework used legal pro/ecfion theory as well as justice theory. Bas'ed on the results of the study obtained lhnt the con.sumer protection law has' provided re.strictions for business actors related to the application ofstundai’d clauses und related to the judge’s rulfng thut decides disputes related to //ie use ofstandard clauses by business actors still ha.s nol sided with consumer’.s und ignores consumer protection laws.

Item Type: Thesis (S2)
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorwidiarty, WiwikNIDN0327096504wiwik.widiarty@gmail.com
Thesis advisorTobing, GindoNIDN8831640017gindotobing@yahoo.com
Subjects: LAW
LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
Divisions: PROGRAM PASCASARJANA > Magister Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Users 1685 not found.
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2022 08:31
Last Modified: 28 Apr 2022 08:31
URI: http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/7803

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item