Hutabarat, Jordan (2022) Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Pertimbangan Hukum HakimDan Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Dengan Pemufakatan Jahat (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung 3509 K/Pid.Sus/2020). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak)
HalJudulAbstrakDaftarisiDaftarGambarDaftarTabelDaftarLampiran.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB) |
|
Text (BAB_I)
BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (271kB) |
|
Text (BAB_II)
BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (394kB) |
|
Text (BAB_III)
BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (88kB) |
|
Text (BAB_IV)
BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (197kB) |
|
Text (BAB_V)
BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (64kB) |
|
Text (Daftar_Pustaka)
DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (170kB) |
|
Text (Lampiran)
Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (717kB) |
Abstract
Narkotika merupakan sebuah zat atau obat yang berasal dari tanaman atau bukan tanaman, baik sintetis maupun semisintetis, yang dapat menyebabkan penurunan kesadaran, hilangnya rasa, mengurangi sampai menghilangkan rasa nyeri, dan menimbulkan ketergantungan. Tindak pidana narkotika yang marak dilakukan saat ini peredaran gelap yang dilakukan dengan cara bermufakat. Pemufakatan jahat adalah perbuatan dua orang atau lebih yang bersekongkol atau bersepakat untuk melakukan tindak pidana narkotika. Metode Penelitian dalam skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Teknik pendekatan penelitian ini meggunakan Teknik penelitian perundan-gundangan. Sumber hukum dari penelitian hukum dengan menerapkan bahan hukum primer dan skunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yaitu dengan studi kepustakaan. Tenik analisis bahan hukum mengunakan metode hukum normatif. Teknik kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menggunakan Teknik deduktif. Berdasarkan analisis penulis berdasarkan data dan fakta, dapat ditarik kesimpulan sebagai berkut: 1) Penerapan Hukum Pidana dalam Putusan Nomor 3509 K/Pid.Sus/2020 sudah dilakukan oleh Hakim. Akan tetapi pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada terdakwa tidak tepat, karena berdasarkan fakta-fakta dipersidangan dan keterangan terdakwa adanya transaksi jual beli antara terdakwa dan saksi. 2) Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam putusan Nomor 3509 K/Pid.Sus/2020 Pidan yang dijatuhkan oleh Hakim 6 (enam) tahun dan Pidana denda Rp 1.000.000.000,- (satu miliar rupiah) subsidair 10 (sepuluh) bulan penjara. Hendaknya Hakim memberikan putusan yang lebih berat melihat pada saat penangkapan terdakwa dan penggeledahan ditemukan barang bukti lebih dari 5 (lima) gram./ Narcotics are substances or drugs derived from plants or non-plants, both synthetic and semi-synthetic, which can cause decreased consciousness, loss of taste, reduce to eliminate pain, and cause dependence. Narcotics crimes are rampant currently being carried out by illicit trafficking which is carried out by consensus. Conspiracy is the act of two or more people who conspire or agree to commit a narcotic crime. The research method in thisthesis uses a normative juridical legal research method. This research approach technique uses legislation research techniques. Legal sources from legal research by applying primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is by studying literature. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses normative legal methods. The conclusion technique of this research uses deductive technique. Based on the author's analysis based on data and facts, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1) The application of the Criminal Law in Decision Number 3509 K/Pid.Sus/2020 has been carried out by the Judge. However, the sentence imposed on the defendant was not appropriate, because based on the facts at trial and the testimony of the defendant there was a sale and purchase transaction between the defendant and the witness. 2) Judge's Legal Considerations in Decision Number 3509 K/Pid.Sus/2020 The sentence handed down by the Judge is 6 (six) years and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000.- (one billion rupiah) subsidiary 10 (ten) months in prison. The judge should give a more severe decision considering that at the time of the arrest of the defendant and the search, evidence of more than 5 (five) grams was found.
Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||
Additional Information: | Nomor Panggil : T.A 345.026 Jor t 2022 | ||||||||||||
Subjects: | LAW LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Criminal law and procedure LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Criminal law and procedure > Criminal law LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law |
||||||||||||
Divisions: | FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum | ||||||||||||
Depositing User: | Users 1842 not found. | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 09 Aug 2022 08:59 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 13 Oct 2022 04:05 | ||||||||||||
URI: | http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/8717 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |