Hukuman Mati Antara Teori Dan Praktek Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Nabit, Erasmus (2020) Hukuman Mati Antara Teori Dan Praktek Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. S2 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Abstrak_Daftar_Isi_Daftar_Singkatan) HalJudulAbstrakDaftarIsiDaftarSingkatan.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (455kB)
	Text (BAB_I) BABI.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (349kB)
	Text (BAB_II) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (393kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (432kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (399kB)
	Text (BAB_V) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (99kB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (192kB)
	Text (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (3MB)

Abstract

Penelitian untuk penulisan tesis berjudul Hukuman Mati Antara Teori dan Praktik Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 menggunakan penelitian kepustakaan bersifat kualitatif juridis/ normatif empiris. Kajiannya adalah menganalisis empat kasus hukum konket yang diputuskan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Depok, Pengadilan Negeri Semarang, dan dua Putusan Peninjauan Kembali MARI.Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi pemikiran hak hidup merupakan hak asasi yang diperoleh secara kodrati bukan hasil pemberian negara. Hak asasi ini merupakan nonderogable rightsyang diatur dalam Pasal 28A dan Pasal 28I Ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui putusan hakimyang diancam dan dituntut dengan pidana hukuman mati pasca Putusan MKRI Nomor 2-3/PPU-V/2007yang bersifat erga omnes. Nampaknya putusan MKRI ini tidak diterapkan sepenuhnya oleh hakim MARI dan hakim badan peradilan umum di bawah MARI.Dalam penelitian ini juga untuk mengetahui peraturan-peraturan hukum pidana dan politik hukum pidana dalam pembaruan hukum pidana di Indonesia. Analisis kasus dalam penelitian ini juga menggunakan landasan teoritis yakni Teori Negara Hukum Pancasila, Teori Konstitusi, dan Teori Hierarki (Jenjang) Hukum masing-masing sebagai grand theory, midle theory, dan operation theory. Landasan teoritis dan ketentuan normatif Pasal 28A dan Pasal 28I Ayat (1) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 ini harus berhadapan dengan asas legalitas formal dalam hukum pidana yang menjadi acuan utama dalam menentukan terdakwa bersalah atau tidak terbukti bersalah melakukan kejahatan. Pembaruan hukum pidana materiel yang menyentuh substansi hukum diharapkan mampu memberikan keadilan bagi pelaku maupun korban dan keluarga korban kejahatan. Tindakan konkret pemerintah mencegah kejahatan sebagai strategi politik kriminal sangat diutamakan dibandingkan menghukum pelaku kejahatan seberat-beratnya sebagai langkah pencegahan kejahatan. Kata Kunci : HAM, Pancasila, Teori Konstitusi, Hierarki (Jenjang) Hukum, UUD NRI Tahun 1945, MARI, MKRI, putusan hakim, pidana hukuman mati, pembaruan hukum pidana./ Research for the writing of a thesis entitled The Death Penalty Between Theory and Practice Post-Amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia using qualitative juridical / empirical normative literature research. The study is analyzing four concrete legal cases decided by the Depok District Court, the Semarang District Court, and two MARI Judgment Decisions. This research is motivated by the thought that the right to life is a human right that is naturally obtained not as a result of state grants. This human right is a nonderogable rights regulated in Article 28A and Article 28I Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This research intends to find out the judge's verdict that is threatened and prosecuted with capital punishment after the MKRI Decision Number 2-3 / PPU-V / 2007 which is erga omnes. It seems that this MKRI decision was not fully implemented by MARI judges and judges of the general judicial body under MARI. In this study it was also to find out criminal law and political law regulations in criminal law reform in Indonesia.The case analysis in this study also uses a theoretical basis, namely the Pancasila Law Theory, Constitutional Theory, and Hierarchical Theory of Law respectively as grand theory, midle theory, and operation theory. The theoretical foundation and normative provisions of Article 28A and Article 28I Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia must deal with the principle of formal legality in criminal law which is the main reference in determining defendants guilty or not proven guilty of committing crimes. The reform of material criminal law that touches on the substance of the law is expected to be able to provide justice for the perpetrators and victims and the families of victims of crime. Concrete actions by the government to prevent crime as a criminal political strategy take precedence over punishing perpetrators as much as possible to prevent crime. Keywords: Human Rights, Pancasila, Constitutional Theory, Legal Hierarchy, 1945 Constitution, MARI, MKRI, judge's ruling, capital punishment, renewal of criminal law.

Actions (login required)

View Item