Analisis Sistem Persidangan Hak Uji Materiil Di Mahkamah Agung Ditinjau Dari Asas Keterbukaan Dan Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem

Simarmata, Dina Lestari Putri (2022) Analisis Sistem Persidangan Hak Uji Materiil Di Mahkamah Agung Ditinjau Dari Asas Keterbukaan Dan Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem. S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Abstrak_Daftar_Isi_Daftar_Gambar_Daftar_Tabel_Daftar_Lampiran) HalJudulAbstrakDaftarIsiDaftarGambarDaftarTabelDaftarLampiran.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (616kB)
	Text (BAB_I) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (197kB)
	Text (BAB_II) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (372kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (208kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (200kB)
	Text (BAB_V) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (65kB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (129kB)
	Text (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (29kB)

Abstract

PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 mengenai Hak Uji Materiil tidak menegaskan secara rinci proses persidangan uji materiil. Keterbatasan tersebut menjadi latar belakang belum sepenuhnya terselenggara transparansi uji materiil pada Mahkamah Agung, banyak pengujian di Mahkamah Agung melaksanakan persidangannya secara tertutup. Rumusan masalah dalam skripsi ini adalah bagaimanakah prosedur pengajuan hak uji materiil, dan mekanisme proses persidangan hak uji materiil di mahkamah agung, serta mengapa proses hak uji materiil di mahkamah agung tidak sepenuhnya menerapkan asas keterbukaan, dan asas audi et alteram partem Metode penelitian skripsi ini menggunakan metode normatif yuridis yang didukung oleh studi kepustakaan dengan perundang-undangan sebagai bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder seperti literatur-literatur dan bahan hukum tersier (non hukum). Hasil penelitian rumusan masalah pertama adalah hak uji materiil di Mahkamah Agung bersifat tidak sepenuhnya transparan, pemohon tidak dapat berupaya secara maksimal sebagaimana upaya yang dilakukan saat melakukan uji materiil di Mahkamah Konstitusi karena singkatnya waktu yang diberikan (14 hari). Hasil penelitian rumusan masalah kedua memaparkan implikasi hukumnya adalah para pihak tidak mengetahui proses pemeriksaan, tidak memiliki hak menghadirkan saksi dan ahli untuk memperkuat dalil permohonan, pemohon juga tidak mengetahui atas dasar apa hakim menetapkan hasil putusan./ Regulation of the Supreme Court No. 1 of 2011 on the Right to Judicial Review does not specify in detail the trial process for the judicial review. This limitation is the background of the non-transparency of judicial review at the Supreme Court, many trials at the Supreme Court carry out closed trials. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is what is the procedure for filing the right to judicial review, and the mechanism for the trial process for the right to judicial review at the Supreme Court, and why the judicial review process at the Supreme Court does not fully implement the principle of openness, and the principle of audi et alteram partem The research method of this thesis uses a juridical normative method which is supported by a literature study with legislation as primary legal material, secondary legal materials such as literature and tertiary legal materials(non-legal). The results of the research on the formulation of the first prob lem are that the right to judicial review at the Supreme Court is not fully transparent, the applicant cannot make maximum efforts as the efforts made when conducting a judicial review at the Constitutional Court due to the short time allotted (14 days). The results of the second problem formulation research describe the legal implications, namely that the parties do not know the examination process, do not have the right to present witnesses and experts to strengthen the arguments for the petition, the applicant also does not know on what basis the judge determines the decision.

Actions (login required)

View Item