Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pendaftar Merek Pertama Berdasarkan ”Asas Priorin Tempora Nelior In Jure” (Analisa Putusan Nomor 576 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020)

Refwalu, Ester Oktaviani (2022) Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pendaftar Merek Pertama Berdasarkan ”Asas Priorin Tempora Nelior In Jure” (Analisa Putusan Nomor 576 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak) HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (754kB)
	Text (BAB_I) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB_II) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB_III) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB_V) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Lampiran) LampiranBiodata.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (235kB)

Abstract

Pendaftaran merek di Indonesia masih menimbulkan polemik dalam pelaksanaannya , salah satu korban ketidakpastian hukum pendaftaran merek adalah Ruben Samuel Onsu sehingga ia mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat, yang merasa dirugikan akibat adanya persamaan merek antara merek Bensu milik Yangcent dan Ruben Onsu padahal Ruben Onsu adalah pendaftar merek pertama atau first to file yang harus dilindungi berdasarkan asas Priorin Tempora Nelior In Jure. Adapun rumusan masalah pada penelitian ini adalah terkait bagaimana perlindungan hukum pendaftar merek pertama dan bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam Putusan Nomor : 576 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020. Metode Penelitian yang Penulis gunakan adalah Metode penelitian Normatif Yuridis menggunakan Studi Kepustakaan dengan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian pada rumusan masalah pertama adalah perlindungan hukum pendaftaran merek telah diatur dalam UU RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek Indikasi dan Geografis dan Permekumham RI Nomor 67/2016 namun belum mengatur mengenai penerapan asas priorin tempora nelior in jure yang melindungi pendaftar merek pertama (first to file). Hasil penelitian pada rumusan masalah kedua adalah dalam pertimbangannya hakim menafsirkan bahwa Ruben Onsu bukanlah pendaftar merek pertama / first to file sehingga dalam putusannya menolak gugatan Ruben Onsu./ In conducting electronic transactions there are also electronic agreements. In the electronic agreement, an electronic signature is signed. The use of electronic signatures in electronic documents can guarantee the security of electronic information messages, electronic signatures are based on asymmetric cryptographic technology. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is the extent of the legal strength of electronic signatures in a business transaction, and whether all electronic signatures signed by the parties are legally valid.This research is a library research. In this study, the authors use primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The primary legal material in this study is Law Number 19 Year 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, PP No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Transactions and Systems, while secondary legal materials are obtained from books and literature, tertiary legal materials are obtained using the internet. The results showed that electronic signatures have legal force and legal consequences such as manual signatures generally described in Article 11 act 1 of Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions , and the validity of electronic signatures are explained in Article 5 act 1 and 2, and explained in Article 53 act 1 and 2 of Government Regulation No. 82/2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Transactions and Systems.

Actions (login required)

View Item