Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Leasing Dalam Perjanjian Leasing Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (Studi : PT. Oto Multiartha Kantor Pusat Jakarta)

Barimbing, Jhony (2022) Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan Leasing Dalam Perjanjian Leasing Pasca Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (Studi : PT. Oto Multiartha Kantor Pusat Jakarta). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Abstrak_Daftar_Isi_Daftar_Gambar_Daftar_Tabel__Daftar_Lampiran) HalJudulAbstrakDaftarisiDaftarGambarDaftarTabelDaftarLampiran.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (11MB)
	Text (BAB_I) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (10MB)
	Text (BAB_II) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (10MB)
	Text (BAB_III) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (10MB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (10MB)
	Text (BAB_V) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (10MB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (10MB)
	Text (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (5MB)

Abstract

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dua hal: Pertama, mengetahui eksekusi jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan PT.Oto Multiartha Kantor Pusat Jakarta jika debitur melakukan cidera janji dalam perjanjian Leasing pasca keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.18/PUU-XVII/2019. dan mengetahui Pelaksanaan penyelesaian pembayaran macet dalam perjanjian yang sudah disepakati para pihak menurut Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis-normatif dengan didukung Yuridis Empiris dan menggunakan pendekatan Kualitatif. untuk menjawab dua hal yang menjadi permasalahan. Dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Sebelum berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.18/PUU/XVII/2019, PT OTO MULTIARTHA KANTOR PUSAT JAKARTA melaksanakan eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia secara sepihak jika debitur tidak melaksanakan prestasi dalam jangka waktu yang telah ditentukan dalam perjanjian pokok yang sudah disepakati oleh para pihak. Namun setelah berlakunya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.18/PUU-XXVII/2019, Pihak PT.OTO MULTIARTHA KANTOR PUSAT JAKARTA mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan jika debitur tidak mengakui akan perbuatan ingkar janji yang sudah dilakukannya dan jika debitur telah mengakui adanya cidera janji namun tidak dengan sukarela menyerahkan benda yang menjadi objek fidusia, pihak perusahaan meminta bantuan ke kepolisian dengan mengajukan permohonan pelaksanaan eksekusi Sertifikat jaminan fidusia. Kata Kunci: Jaminan Fidusia, Leasing, Perjanjian, Eksekusi / The purpose of this study is to find out two things: First, to find out the execution of fiduciary guarantees carried out by PT. Oto Multiartha Jakarta Head Office if the debtor breaks his promise in the Leasing agreement after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision No.18/PUU-XVII/2019. and knowing the implementation of the settlement of non-performing payments in the agreement that has been agreed upon by the parties according to the Fiduciary Guarantee Law. The research method used is the juridical-normative method supported by the Juridical Empirical and using a qualitative approach. to answer two things that are problematic. The results of this study indicate that prior to the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision No.18/PUU/XVII/2019, PT OTO MULTIARTHA KANTOR PUSAT JAKARTA carried out the execution of the object of fiduciary security unilaterally if the debtor did not carry out the achievements within the period specified in the main agreement that had been agreed upon. agreed upon by the parties. However, after the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision No.18/PUU-XXVII/2019, PT. OTO MULTIARTHA OFFICE JAKARTA CENTRAL OFFICE filed a lawsuit to the court if the debtor does not acknowledge the breach of promise he has committed and if the debtor has admitted a breach of contract but not with voluntarily surrendering objects that are fiduciary objects, the company asks for help from the police by submitting an application for the execution of the fiduciary guarantee certificate. Keywords: Fiduciary Guarantee, Leasing, Agreement, Execution"

Actions (login required)

View Item