Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas

Natalia, Dea (2022) Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas. S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

[img] Text (Hal_Judul_Abstrak_Daftar_Isi_Daftar_Gambar_Daftar_Tabel_Daftar_Lampiran)
HalJudulAbstrakDaftarisiDaftarGambarDaftarTabelDaftarLampiran.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (1MB)
[img] Text (BAB_I)
BABI.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (941kB)
[img] Text (BAB_II)
BABII.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (941kB)
[img] Text (BAB_III)
BABIII.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (941kB)
[img] Text (BAB_IV)
BABIV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (941kB)
[img] Text (BAB_V)
BABV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (941kB)
[img] Text (Daftar_Pustaka)
DaftarPustaka.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

Download (938kB)

Abstract

Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kepanjen Nomor 1/Pid.Sus- Anak/2020/PN.KPn, hakim menganggap bahwa kasus yang dilakukan Anak bukan suatu noodweer exces, melainkan sebuah penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan kematian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang suatu tindakan yang dapat dikatakan sebagai pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk batasan pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas menurut ketentuan hukum Pidana dan pertimbangan hakim tentang pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa penerapan Pasal 49 ayat (2) yang dijadikan bahan pertimbangan oleh hakim tidak dapat dibuktikan dikarenakan tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak bukan merupakan tindakan yang dapat dimaafkan sesuai dengan pasal 49 ayat (2)./ Kepanjen District Court Decision Number 1/Pid.Sus-Child/2020/PN.KPn, where the judge considers that the case committed by the child is not a noodweer exces, but an abuse that results in death. This study aims to find out about an action that can be said as a forced defense that exceeds the limit. In addition, this study also aims to limit the forced defense that exceeds the limit according to the provisions of criminal law and the judge's consideration of the forced defense that exceeds the limit. The author in this study uses normative juridical using a conceptual approach to legislation, as well as an approach to cases. The results of this study are the application of Article 49 paragraph (2) which is taken into consideration by the judge cannot be proven because a criminal act committed by a child is not an act that can be forgiven in accordance with Article 49 paragraph (2).

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Contributors:
ContributionContributorsNIDN/NIDKEmail
Thesis advisorPanjaitan, PetrusNIDN0321125804UNSPECIFIED
Thesis advisorSitumeang, TomsonNIDN0325028101UNSPECIFIED
Additional Information: Nomor Panggil : T.A 364.36 Dea t 2022
Subjects: LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Criminal law and procedure
Divisions: FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Users 1449 not found.
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2022 02:23
Last Modified: 11 Oct 2022 03:14
URI: http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/7114

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item