Sifat Putusan Final dan Mengikat Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (Studi Kasus PTUN No. 82/G/2020/PTUN.JKT)

Sitompul, Kevin Reynara Parsaulian (2022) Sifat Putusan Final dan Mengikat Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (Studi Kasus PTUN No. 82/G/2020/PTUN.JKT). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Daftar_Lampiran_Abstrak) JudulDaftarIsiDaftarLampiranAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Bab_1) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (708kB)
	Text (Bab_2) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Bab_3) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Bab_4) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (630kB)
	Text (Bab_5) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (390kB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DAFTARPUSTAKA.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (417kB)
	Text (Lampiran) LAMPIRAN.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (127kB)

Abstract

DKPP melalui Putusan Nomor: 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 memberhentikan Evi Novida Ginting Manik sebagai Anggota KPU RI. Presiden Joko Widodo kemudian menerbitkan Surat Keputusan Presiden Nomor 34/P Tahun 2020 yang memberhentikan Evi Novida Ginting secara tidak hormat per tanggal 23 Maret 2020. Evi Novida Ginting melawan dengan menggugat Keppres tersebut ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Jakarta. Putusan PTUN Jakarta Nomor: 82/G/2020/PTUN-JKT “mengabulkan untuk seluruhnya” gugatan Evi. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui bagaimana status, kewenangan dan kedudukan DKPP menurut Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta mengetahui apakah DKPP memiliki kewenangan memberhentikan Komisioner KPU melalui mekanisme peradilan etiknya dan mengetahui sifat putusan DKPP serta hubungan hukumnya dengan Keputusan Presiden. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus dan yuridis normatif serta jenis penelitian analisis deskriptif. Sumber penelitian menggunakan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Analisis data menggunakan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan DKPP yang bersifat final dan mengikat tidak termasuk pada Keputusan yang dikeluarkan oleh badan peradilan, melainkan masuk pada Keputusan yang dikeluarkan oleh Badan atau Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara. Kedudukan DKPP sebagai lembaga quasi peradilan untuk penyelenggara pemilu tidak berada di bawah kekuasaan kehakiman sebagaimana keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 115/PHPU.D-XI/2013. Kata Kunci:Putusan, Final dan Mengikat, DKPP/DKPP through Decision Number: 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 dismissed Evi Novida Ginting Manik as a Member of KPU RI. President Joko Widodo then issued Presidential Decree No. 34/P of 2020 dismissing Evi Novida Ginting disrespectfully as of March 23, 2020. Evi Novida Ginting fought back by suing the Presidential Decree to the Jakarta State Administrative Court (PTUN). Jakarta PTUN Decision Number: 82/G/2020/PTUN-JKT "grants for all" of Evi's lawsuit. The purpose of the research is to find out how the status, authority and position of the DKPP according to the applicable laws and regulations and find out whether the DKPP has the authority to dismiss the KPU Commissioner through its ethical judicial mechanism and know the nature of the DKPP ruling and its legal relationship with the Presidential Decree. This research uses descriptive qualitative analysis methods with case study and normative juridical approaches as well as other types of descriptive analysis research. Data collection techniques use literature studies. Data analysis uses qualitative. The results showed that the final and binding DKPP decision does not include decisions issued by judicial bodies, but rather entered into decisions issued by state administrative bodies or officials. The position of the DKPP as a judicial quasi institution for election organizers is not under the power of the judiciary as the constitutional court decree No. 115 / PHPU. D-XI/2013. Keywords: Verdict, Final and Binding, DKPP

Actions (login required)

View Item