Permana, Ilham (2026) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM KEJAHATAN PERPAJAKAN DENGAN PENYERTAAN (DEELNEMING) (Studi Putusan Nomor 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Sel). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
|
Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak)
HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (3MB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB_I)
BABI.pdf Download (589kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB_II)
BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (656kB) |
||
|
Text (BAB_III)
BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (563kB) |
||
|
Text (BAB_IV)
BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (555kB) |
||
|
Text (BAB_V)
BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (199kB) |
||
|
Text (DAFTAR_PUSTAKA)
DAFTARPUSTAKA.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (309kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A. Nama : Ilham Permana B. NIM : 2340058044 C. Bagian : Hukum Pidana D. Judul : Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Kejahatan Perpajakan dengan Penyertaan (Deelneming) (Studi Putusan Nomor 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Sel). E. Halaman : 110 Halaman + Daftar Pustaka F. Kata Kunci : Tindak Pidana Perpajakan; Pertanggungjawaban Pidana; Penyertaan (Deelneming); Putusan Pengadilan; Kepastian Hukum. G. Ringkasan Isi : Tindak pidana perpajakan adalah salah satu bentuk kejahatan ekonomi yang berdampak langsung terhadap penerimaan negara. Dalam praktik penegakan hukum, tindak pidana perpajakan sering dilakukan secara bersama-sama melalui kerja sama beberapa pihak dalam struktur korporasi, hubungan jabatan, maupun relasi fungsional lainnya. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan persoalan yuridis terkait penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana dengan penyertaan (deelneming), khususnya dalam menentukan peran masing-masing pelaku, tingkat kesalahan, serta proporsionalitas pidana yang dijatuhkan. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jaksel atas nama terdakwa Achmad Yasier dipilih sebagai objek penelitian karena mencerminkan kompleksitas penerapan konsep penyertaan dalam tindak pidana perpajakan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum primer meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang perpajakan dan hukum pidana serta putusan pengadilan yang relevan, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder terdiri atas doktrin dan literatur hukum. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan metode penalaran deduktif untuk menilai kesesuaian antara norma hukum, doktrin, dan pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan yang diteliti. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam Putusan Nomor: 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jaksel belum sepenuhnya memperlihatkan pembedaan yang jelas mengenai peran dan tingkat kesalahan para pelaku dalam tindak pidana perpajakan yang dilakukan secara bersama-sama. Pertimbangan hakim cenderung menempatkan terdakwa sebagai pelaku individual tanpa analisis mendalam mengenai struktur penyertaan dan kontribusi kausal perbuatannya. Hal ini berpotensi mengurangi terpenuhinya prinsip keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan proporsionalitas pidana, sehingga diperlukan penguatan analisis deelneming dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana perpajakan. H. Daftar Acuan : 18 Buku dan Literatur + 9 Peraturan PerundangUndangan + 1 Putusan Pengadilan + 7 Artikel dan Jurnal + 2 Internet I. Dosen Pembimbing I : Prof. Dr. Hulman Panjaitan, S.H., M.H. Dosen Pembimbing II : Assoc. Prof. Hendri Jayadi, S.H., M.H H. / A. Name : Ilham Permana B. Student ID : 2340058044 C. Major : Civil Law D. Title : Criminal Liability in Tax Crimes with Inclusion (Deelneming) (Number Decision Study 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jkt.Sel) E. Pages : 110 pages + Bibliography F. Keywords : Tax Crimes; Criminal Liability; Participation (Deelneming); Court Decisions; Legal Certainty. G. Summary : Tax crimes constitute a form of economic offense that directly affects state revenue and national fiscal stability. In law enforcement practice, tax crimes are often committed through collective actions involving multiple actors within corporate structures, professional relationships, or positions of authority. This situation gives rise to complex legal issues concerning the application of criminal liability based on participation (deelneming), particularly in determining the role, degree of culpability, and proportionality of punishment imposed on each offender. The Decision Number 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jaksel in the case of Achmad Yasier is examined in this study because it reflects judicial challenges in attributing individual criminal responsibility within collective tax crime schemes. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of tax and criminal law legislation as well as relevant court decisions, while secondary legal materials include legal doctrines and scholarly writings. Legal materials are collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using deductive legal reasoning to assess the consistency between legal norms, doctrinal principles, and judicial considerations applied in the examined court decision. The findings indicate that the application of criminal liability in Decision Number 583/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Jaksel does not fully demonstrate a clear differentiation of roles and levels of culpability among participants in the tax crime. Judicial reasoning tends to treat the defendant as an individual offender without comprehensive analysis of the structure of participation and causal contribution to the offense. This approach potentially undermines the principles of justice, legal certainty, and proportionality of punishment. Therefore, this study emphasizes the need to strengthen the application of participation theory in tax crime adjudication to ensure fair, consistent, and accountable law enforcement in Indonesia. H. References : 18 Books and Literature + 9 Legislation + 1 Court ruling + 7 Articles and Journals + 2 Internet. I. Thesis Adviser I : Prof. Dr. Hulman Panjaitan, S.H., M.H. Thesis Adcisor II : Assoc. Prof. Hendri Jayadi, S.H., M.H H.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||
| Subjects: | LAW LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Public finance LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Criminal law and procedure LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Trials |
||||||||||||
| Divisions: | FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum | ||||||||||||
| Depositing User: | Mr Ilham Permana | ||||||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 03 Jul 2026 03:11 | ||||||||||||
| Last Modified: | 03 Jul 2026 03:11 | ||||||||||||
| URI: | http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/22093 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
