Israel, Israel (2026) ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN BEBAS PADA KASUS KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 2/JN.Anak/2023/MS.Cag). S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS KRISTEN INDONESIA.
|
Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak)
HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (991kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB_I)
BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (419kB) | Preview |
|
|
Text (BAB_II)
BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (681kB) |
||
|
Text (BAB_III)
BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (344kB) |
||
|
Text (BAB_IV)
BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (319kB) |
||
|
Text (BAB_V)
BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (228kB) |
||
|
Text (Daftar_Pustaka)
DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (301kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi oleh meningkatnya kasus kekearasan seksual terhadap anak di Indonesia serta masih ditemukannya putusan bebas dalam praktik peradilan pidana akibat keterbatasan alat bukti. Kondisi tersebut menimbulkan persoalan mengenai efektivitas perlindungan hukum bagi anak sebagai korban serta pertimbangan yuridis hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi anak korban kekerasan seksual dan mengkaji pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bebas pada perkara nomor 2/JN.Anak/2023/MS.Cag. kerangka teori yang digunakan meliputi teori perlindungan hukum dan teori pembuktian negatif menurut undang-undang (negative wettelijk), dengan kajian Pustaka yang bersumber pada peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, dan literatur ilmiah terkait. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Penggalian data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan seksual telah diatur secara komprehensif, namun dalam praktik pembuktian di persidangan masih menghadapi kendala yang berdampak pada dijatuhkannya putusan bebas. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya optimalisasi pembuktian dan konsisten pertimbangan hakim agar perlindungan hukum bagi anak sebagai korban dapat terwujud secara substantif. /This research is motivated by the increasing number of cases of sexual violence against children in Indonesia, as well as the continued issuance of acquittal verdicts in criminal judicial practice due to insufficient evidence. This condition raises concerns regarding the effectiveness of legal protection for children as victims and the juridical considerations applied by judges in rendering their decisions. The purpose of this research is to analyze the forms of legal protection afforded to child victims of sexual violence and to examine the judicial considerations underlying acquittal decisions in Case Number 2/JN.Anak/2023/MS.Cag. The theoretical framework employed in this study includes the theory of legal protection and the theory of negative statutory proof (negative wettelijk), supported by a review of legal literature derived from statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant scholarly works. The research method applied is normative juridical research using statutory and case approaches. Data collection was conducted through library research on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings of this research indicate that, normatively, legal protection for child victims of sexual violence has been comprehensively regulated; however, in judicial practice, evidentiary constraints persist and significantly contribute to the issuance of acquittal decisions. The conclusion of this research emphasizes the importance of optimizing evidentiary processes and ensuring consistency in judicial reasoning in order to realize substantive legal protection for children as victims.
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||
| Subjects: | LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence LAW > Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica Asia South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia LAW > Asia and Eurasia, Africa, Pacific Area, and Antarctica Asia South Asia. Southeast Asia. East Asia > Indonesia |
||||||||||||
| Divisions: | FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum | ||||||||||||
| Depositing User: | Users 7347 not found. | ||||||||||||
| Date Deposited: | 26 Aug 2026 08:41 | ||||||||||||
| Last Modified: | 26 Aug 2026 09:07 | ||||||||||||
| URI: | http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/21982 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
