Analisis Yuridis Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer Exces) Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1225/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Jkt.Sel)

Sianipar, Christine Natiar (2024) Analisis Yuridis Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer Exces) Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 1225/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Jkt.Sel). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak) HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB_I) BAB I.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (319kB)
	Text (BAB_II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (496kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (365kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (360kB)
	Text (BAB_V) BAB V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (194kB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (304kB)

Abstract

Di dalam ketentuan Kitab Undang – Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dikenal adanya alasan penghapus pidana, yaitu alasan yang memungkinkan seorang yang melakukan perbuatan yang seharusnya telah memenuhi rumusan delik, tetapi tidak dipidana. Salah satunya alasan pemaaf, yaitu alasan yang menghapuskan kesalahan pelaku. Jadi walaupun perbuatannya terbukti melanggar undang-undang, karena alasan pemaaf pelaku tidak dipidana, artinya perbuatannya tersebut tetap melawan hukum, namun karena hilang atau hapusnya kesalahan pada diri pelaku maka perbuatannya tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Adapun rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini meliputi pengaturan tentang pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas (noodweer exces) menurut hukum pidana di Indonesia dan juga meliputi penerapan pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas (noodweer exces) dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 1225/Pid.B/2020/PN.Jkt.Sel pada tanggal 3 Mei 2021. Metode Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan kasus atau case approach. data yang digunakan data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, yaitu perundang – undangan dan putusan bahan hukum sekunder pendapat para ahli. Bahan Hukum Tersier, yaitu seperti kamus hukum, jurnal hukum, ensiklopedia, kemudian bahan hukum yang terkumpul disusun dan di analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdakwa telah memenuhi semua unsur – unsur pembelaan terpaksa yang melampaui batas (noodweer exces) sesuai dengan keabsahannya yang diatur dalam ketentuan Pasal 49 Ayat (2) KUHP. Bahwa terdakwa tidak sengaja menusukkan sebilah pisau kepada korban karena keadaan jiwa terdakwa pada saat itu sedang dalam guncangan yang hebat. Kata Kunci : Pembelaan Terpaksa, Noodweer Exces, Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. / In the provisions of the Criminal Code (KUHP), there are reasons for the elimination of punishment, namely reasons that allow a person who commits an act that should have fulfilled the formulation of the offense, but is not punished. One of them is the reason for forgiveness, which is the reason that eliminates the guilt of the perpetrator. So even though his actions are proven to violate the law, because of the reasons for forgiveness the perpetrator is not punished, meaning that his actions are still against the law, but because of the loss or elimination of guilt in the perpetrator, his actions cannot be held accountable. This research covers the regulation of excessive forcr defense (noodweer exces) according to criminal law in Indonesia and also covers the application of excessive force defense (noodweer exces) in the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 1225/Pid.B/2020/PN. Jkt. Sel on May 3. 2021. This research method is normative legal research, with a case approach or case approach. the data used secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, namely legislation and decisions of secondary legal materials of experts' opinions. Tertiary legal materials, such as legal dictionaries, legal journals, encyclopedias, then the collected legal materials are compiled and analyzed. The results showed that the defendant had fulfilled all the elements of an overreaching defense (noodweer exces) in accordance with its validity which is regulated in provisions of Article 49 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code. The defendant had no intention of taking the life of the victim, and the incident occurred because the defendant’s mental state at that time was in severse shock Keywords : Involuntary Defense, Noodweer Exces, Crime of Maltreatment typhi

Actions (login required)

View Item