Effendy, Argawaty (2019) Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Merek Terkenal dari Pelanggaran Merek di Indonesia. S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak)
HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (940kB) |
|
Text (BAB_I)
BABI.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (366kB) |
|
Text (BAB_II)
BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (406kB) |
|
Text (BAB_III)
BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (339kB) |
|
Text (BAB_IV)
BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (325kB) |
|
Text (BAB_V)
BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (105kB) |
|
Text (Daftar_Pustaka)
DaftarPustaka.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (13kB) |
Abstract
Indonesia tunduk kepada instrumen intemasional seperti (The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Properly Konvensi Paris) dan {Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Including Trade in Counterfeit GoodTRIPs). Akan tetapi ketentuan ini memberikan kebebasan kepada setiap negara anggota untuk menetapkan dan mengatur keterkenalan suatu merek di negaranya masing-masing. Oleh sebab itu, penentuan keterkenalan suatu merek pada akhimya tetap diserahkan kepada majelis hakim. Pada dasamya perlindungan terhadap merek terkenal bisa menerapkan asas itikad tidak baik kepada pemohon yang mendaftarkan mereknya secara tidak jujur karena, meniru, atau menjiplak ketenaran suatu merek sehingga merugikan pihak lain atau menimbulkan kondisi persaingan curang, mengecoh, atau menyesatkan konsumen. Namun, pembuktian adanya itikad tidak baik juga merupakan pekerjaan yang sangat sulit karena harus dikaitkan dengan pembuktian adanya persamaan pada pokoknya atau keseluruhannya yang dalam undang- undang merek juga belum diatur secara lengkap dan jelas. Selanjutnya pembuktian adanya asas itikad tidak baik juga harus didahului dengan pembuktian keterkenalan merek tersebut. Oleh karena itu, harus ada peraturan yang mengatur secara jelas mengenai keterkenalan suatu merek dan mengenai peniruan merek yang mengakibatkan persaingan curang. Sehingga sengketa yang berkaitan dengan peniruan merek terkenal dapat diselesaikan atau sedapat mungkin dihindari. Kata kunci: Merek terkenal, itikad baik, persaingan curang. / Indonesia is subject to several international instruments such as (The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property Konvensi Paris) dan (Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Including Trade in Counterfeit GoodTRIPs). However, this provision gives freedom to each member state to stipulate and regulate fame of a trademark in their respective country. Therefore, determining the fame of a trademark eventually is left to panel of judges. Basically the protection of well-known mark can apply the principles of bad faith to an applicant who registers his/her brands dihonestly because of imitating, or tracing the fame of the trademark that cause disadvantage to another party or arousing condition of unfair competition, deceiving or misleading the consumers. However proving the existence of bad faith is also a very hard job because it must be associated with proving the existence of the equation substantially or wholly which Law on Trademark has not clearly and completely regulated. Furthermore, proving the bad faith principles must be preceded by proving the fame of the trademark. Therefore, there must be clear rules governing the fame of a trademark and the imitation trademark resulting in unfair competition. So that disputes relating to pemboncengan well-known marks can be solved or avoided wherever possible. Key words: Well-known trademark, good faith, unfair competition.
Item Type: | Thesis (S1) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contributors: |
|
||||||||||||
Subjects: | LAW | ||||||||||||
Divisions: | FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum | ||||||||||||
Depositing User: | Mr Novan Arbi | ||||||||||||
Date Deposited: | 08 Aug 2024 09:52 | ||||||||||||
Last Modified: | 08 Aug 2024 09:52 | ||||||||||||
URI: | http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/15573 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |