Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dalam Pembuktian Unsur-Unsur Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus: Nomor 713/Pid.B/2018/PN. JKT.Sel)

Aprildo, Lucas (2023) Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dalam Pembuktian Unsur-Unsur Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus: Nomor 713/Pid.B/2018/PN. JKT.Sel). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak) HalJudulDaftarIsiAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (5MB)
	Text (BAB I) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (862kB)
	Text (BAB II) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (579kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (441kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB IV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (369kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (88kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (624kB)

Abstract

Skripsi ini berjudul “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim dalam Pembuktian Unsur – Unsur Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Nomor 713/PID.B/2018/ PN JKT.SEL)”. Dalam penulisan skripsi ini, digunakan metode penelitian normative dan penelitian empiris, dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual dan studi kasus. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah (1) Bagaimana unsur-unsur tindak pidana penganiayaan yang harus dibuktikan? (2) Bagaimana pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan tindak pidana penganiayaan perkara nomor 713/PID.B/2018/ PN JKT.SEL? Dari penelitian hukum yang telah dilakukan dengan menggunakan penelitian yang disebutkan diatas dapat disimpulkan bahwa, pada rumusan masalah yang pertama mengenai unsur-unsur tindak pidana penganiayaan yang harus terbukti dalam proses peradilan meliputi: adanya tindakan fisik yang mengakibatkan atau berpotensi mengakibatkan cedera atau penderitaan bagi korban, niat jahat atau kesengajaan pelaku dalam melakukan tindakan tersebut, kausalitas antara tindakan pelaku dan dampak yang ditimbulkan, serta identitas pelaku yang dapat dipastikan melalui bukti yang sah. Tugas jaksa penuntut umum atau penuntut umum adalah membuktikan unsur-unsur tersebut di hadapan pengadilan untuk menentukan kesalahan terdakwa. Prinsip "dibuktikan di hadapan pengadilan" penting untuk menjaga kepastian hukum, melindungi hak-hak individu, dan mencegah penyalahgunaan kekuasaan oleh aparat penegak hukum. Sedangkan, dalam rumusan masalah kedua disimpulkan bahwa pertimbangan hukum oleh hakim pada kasus Nomor: 713/Pid.B/2018/PN JKT.SEL dengan memutuskan bahwa terdakwa telah secara sah dan meyakinkan melanggar pasal 351 ayat (1) KUHP tentang penganiayaan. Namun Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam memeberikan dakwaan kurang tepat sehingga hakim memberi pertimbangan dalam memutus perkara tersebut tidak mempertimbangkan bukti-bukti seperti Visum Et Repertum Nomor. 2018/03/17/VET/JP/016 Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Jatipadang tanggal 30 April 2018 atas nama Faisal Zulkarnain sebagai pertimbangkan agar terdakwa dikenakan pasal 354 ayat (1) tentang tindak pidana Penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan luka berat./ This thesis is entitled "Law Enforcement of Criminal Acts of Domestic Violence Based on Law Number 23 of 2004 (Case Study of Brebes District Court Decision Number 87/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Bbs). In writing this thesis, normative research methods and empirical research are used, using a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case studies. The formulation of the problems in this study are (1) How are law enforcement efforts against acts of domestic violence? (2) What are the considerations of the judge in the case study number: Number 87/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Bbs is in accordance with the Domestic Violence Law. From the legal research that has been conducted using the research mentioned above, it can be concluded that, in the first problem formulation regarding law enforcement efforts in the Law on the Elimination of Domestic Violence involves criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines determined by the Judge. In addition, the Judge may also impose additional penalties, such as restrictions on the movement of the perpetrator and counseling programs. The court also has the authority to establish temporary protection for the victim before the trial begins. In addition, there has been no court decision that imposes additional punishment as stipulated in the Law. Protection for victims of domestic violence through court decisions is also not widely recognized and applied by the community. Meanwhile, in the formulation of the second problem, it is concluded that based on District Court Decision Number 87/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bbs, there has been a crime of domestic violence in accordance with the definition in Article 1 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 23/2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence. The victim in this case qualifies as a victim of domestic violence based on Article 1 Paragraph (3) of the Law. However, in the judge's assessment based on the indictment, the defendant was only charged with the subsidiary charge, namely Article 44 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 23/2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence which includes the element of physical violence within the scope of the household.

Actions (login required)

View Item