Pertanggungjawaban Debitor Pailit Perorangan dalam Kepailitan (Studi Putusan No. 55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)

Elina, Novi (2024) Pertanggungjawaban Debitor Pailit Perorangan dalam Kepailitan (Studi Putusan No. 55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak) HalJudulDaftarIsiLampiranAbstrak.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (BAB_I) BAB I.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (315kB)
	Text (BAB_II) BAB II.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (318kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BAB III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (390kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BAB IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (286kB)
	Text (BAB_V) BAB V.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (95kB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DaftarPustaka.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (145kB)
	Text (Lampiran) Lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (5MB)

Abstract

Kepailitan dapat terjadi apabila seseorang atau badan hukum memiliki perjanjian kerjasama dengan orang lain, tetapi pada akhirnya harus mengalami kepailitan karena salah satu pihak dalam perjanjian tersebut tidak dapat melaksanakan kewajibannya dan juga telah memenuhi syarat kepailitan pada Pasal 2 ayat (1) UUK PKPU. Keadaan kepailitan sering sekali terjadi pada suatu badan hukum yaitu perusahaan, tetapi hal ini juga dapat terjadi pada individu atau perorangan. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pengaturan hukum permohonan pernyataan pailit terhadap debitor perorangan yang tidak dapat melunasi utangnya di Indonesia dan bagaimana penerapan hukum kepailitan terhadap debitor perorangan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan No. 55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Metode penelitian yang dipakai dalam penelitan ini adalah yuridis normatif dan dihubungkan dengan pendekatan hukum sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer yaitu KUHPerdata, KUHD, UU No 37 Tahun 2004 dan Putusan No.55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, bahan hukum sekunder yaitu buku teks, jurnal, hasil penelitian, serta bahan hukum tersier yaitu Kamus Hukum, KBBI, dan internet yang berkaitan dengan pembahasan dalam penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan khusus terkait permohonan pernyataan pailit terhadap debitor perorangan tidak diatur secara khusus di UU No 37 Tahun 2004 sehingga menimbulkan adanya ketidakpastian terhadap debitor perorangan dalam hal penjatuhan hukuman. Selain itu, penerapan hukum kepailitan debitor perorangan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan No.55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dinyatakan telah sesuai karena debitor dalam kasus pada putusan tersebut telah memenuhi unsur kepailitan yang diatur pada Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU No 37 Tahun 2004. Kata kunci : Debitor Perorangan, Kepailitan, Pengaturan Hukum, Penerapan Hukum. / Bankruptcy can occur if a person or legal entity has a cooperation agreement with another person, but in the end must experience bankruptcy because one of the parties to the agreement cannot carry out its obligations and has also met the bankruptcy requirements in article 2 paragraph (1) of the UUK PKPU. Bankruptcy often occurs in a legal entity, namely a company, but this can also happen to individuals or individuals. The formulation of the problem in this study is how to regulate the legal arrangement of applications for bankruptcy declarations against individual debtors who are unable to pay their debts in Indonesia and how to apply bankruptcy law to individual debtors based on Court Decision No. 55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The research method used in this research is normative juridical and is linked to a secondary legal approach consisting of primary legal materials, namely the Civil Code, the Criminal Code, UU No. 37 of 2004 and Decision No. 55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst, secondary legal materials, namely textbooks, journals, research results, and tertiary legal materials, namely Legal Dictionary, KBBI, and the internet related to discussions in research. The results of this study show that the special regulations related to the application for bankruptcy declaration against individual debtors are not specifically regulated in Law No. 37 of 2004, so that there is uncertainty for individual debtors in terms of punishment. In addition, the application of the bankruptcy law of individual debtors is based on Court Decision No.55/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst was declared to be appropriate because the debtor in the case in the decision had fulfilled the elements of bankruptcy stipulated in article 2 paragraph (1) of UU No. 37 of 2004.Keywords : Individual Debtor, Bankruptcy, Legal Regulation, Application of Law.

Actions (login required)

View Item