Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat No : 1761/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Jkt.Brt.)

Septiando, Charles (2018) Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat No : 1761/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Jkt.Brt.). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

[img]
Preview
Text
Hal_Judul_Abstrak_Daftar_Isi.pdf

Download (495kB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB_I.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (385kB)
[img] Text
BAB_II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (611kB)
[img] Text
BAB_III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (141kB)
[img] Text
BAB_IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (409kB)
[img] Text
BAB_V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (215kB)
[img]
Preview
Text
Daftar_Pustaka.pdf

Download (8kB) | Preview

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan hukum pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang dilakukan oleh suami terhadap istri dalam putusan Nomor: 1761/Pid.Sus/2016/PN/.Jkt.Brt Hasil yang dicapai setelah melakukan penelitian adalah : Dalam kasus yang diteliti oleh Penulis, pada proses pembuktiannya digunakan alat bukti yaitu keterangan saksi korban, keterangan saksi, keterangan terdakwa dan alat bukti surat yaitu Visum Et Repertum untuk membuktikan kesalahan terdakwa. Baik dalam proses penyidikan sampai pada proses pembuktian di persidangan, ditemukan persesuaian antara keterangan saksi, keterangan terdakwa dan dihubungkan dengan bukti surat Visum Et Repertum. Pada umumnya, sering kali terjadi bahwa ketersediaan alat-alat bukti yang digunakan dalam membuktikan kesalahan dari terdakwa tindak pidana KDRT sangatlah minim dan terbatas.Meskipun secara umum masih banyak hambatan-hambatan dalam proses pembuktian tindak pidana KDRT khususnya dalam persoalan alat bukti, namun demikian khusus untuk kasus yang diteliti oleh Saya tidak terdapat kendala yang cukup berarti dalam membuktikan perbuatan terdakwa, hal tersebut dikarenakan ketersediaan beberapa alat bukti yang saling berkesesuaian, sehingga tidak menyulitkan hakim untuk memperoleh keyakinan bahwa terdakwa benar telah melakukan kekerasan terhadap korban.Alat-alat bukti tersebut sebagaimana telah dikemukakan oleh Saya pada pembahasan sebelumnya, yaitu keterangan saksi korban yang merupakan isteri dari Pelaku maupun dari saksi yang lain. Selain itu di dukung oleh bukti surat yaitu Visum Et Repertum. Dan juga keterangan terdakwa yang pada intinya mengakui perbuatannya terhadap saksi korban Kata Kunci : Kdrt, Visum Et Repertum, Perlindungan, Undang-Undang. This study aims to determine the application of criminal law against criminal Acts in Domestic Violence judge's legal considerations in imposing criminal sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts of domestic violence committed by the husband against his wife in the decision Number: 1761 / Pid.Sus / 2016 / PN / .Jkt.Brt. The results achieved after conducting the research are: In the case investigated by the author, evidence was used in the proofing process, namely the testimony of the victim witness, witness testimony, statement of the defendant and evidence of the letter namely Visum Et Repertum to prove the accused's guilt. Both in the investigation process to the evidentiary process at the trial, it was found that there was a match between the testimony of witnesses, the defendant's statement and was connected with evidence of the Visum Et Repertum letter. In general, it often happens that the availability of evidence used to prove wrongdoing of a defendant in a criminal act of domestic violence is very minimal and limited. Although in general there are still many obstacles in the process of proving a crime of domestic violence, especially in the case of evidence, but specifically For the case investigated by me there is no significant obstacle in proving the defendant's actions, it is due to the availability of some evidence that is mutually compatible, so it does not make it difficult for the judge to believe that the defendant has actually committed violence against the victim. I have stated in the previous discussion, namely the witness testimony of the victim who is the wife of the Actor as well as from other witnesses. Also supported by evidence of the letter, namely Visum Et Repertum. And also the statement of the defendant which in essence acknowledged his actions towards the witnesses of the victim Key Word : domestic violence, Visum Et Repertum, Protection, Law.

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Subjects: SOCIAL SCIENCES > The Family. Marriage. Women > The family. Marriage. Home
POLITICAL SCIENCE > Political theory. The state. Theories of the state > Violence. Political violence
LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Constitutional law > Constitutional courts and procedure
Divisions: FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Mr Alexander Jeremia
Date Deposited: 30 Mar 2020 03:58
Last Modified: 30 Mar 2020 03:58
URI: http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/1452

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item