Lumbantoruan, Jitu Halomoan (2022) Identifikasi Kesiapan dan Kesulitan Guru Matematika Dalam Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19. EduMatSains Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 6 (2). pp. 231-244. ISSN 2527 7235
Text
IdentifikasiKesiapandanKesulitanGuruMatematika.pdf Download (1MB) |
|
Text (Bukti Korespodensi)
KorespodensiIdentifikasiKesiapanDanKesulitanGuruMatematika.pdf Download (2MB) |
Abstract
Research aims; 1) How is the online learning process during the pandemic, 2) The form of readiness in the learning process, 3) The assessment method measures the success of the online learning process, 34 provinces stated that 58% were not effective in carrying out the learning process, 38% lacked guidance, 35% access to communication was not good, 62% of respondents need smooth internet access, quota assistance, 59.5% above (PR), 92% have difficulty interacting, 5% are still in school, 87% are online learning, 13% are not learning. Of the respondents studying online, 92%, it is quite difficult. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. Collection of primary data and secondary data. Analysis with data reduction, presentation, conclusion and verification. Research at SMA Yadika 11, SMK 4 and SMA 7 Bekasi. The results of the analysis, 1) 95% of the online learning process is still from curriculum 13, the school facilitates teachers. However, when the implementation was not in line with expectations, this was because the material provided was not prepared with the standard of the initial ability of students, the books provided were not strong enough to build concepts, educators had difficulty writing symbols, student responses to professional competence were 79%, 70% of participants students assess that teachers do not have teaching materials and modules used as learning aids, observing 4 teacher materials have difficulty explaining related to writing symbols and proof. 2) The form of readiness by providing textbooks as the main source, however, books with cognitive dimensions. Lots and not hot books, this is not in line with curriculum 13. 3) The assessment method is prepared by the teacher, however, the assessment method is not given and the material tested is more difficult than what is taught and 60% disagrees with the teacher's assessment method. Keywords: teacher difficulty; teacher readiness; 2013 curriculum
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | EDUCATION |
Depositing User: | Ms Mentari Simanjuntak |
Date Deposited: | 02 Feb 2022 14:39 |
Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2023 07:06 |
URI: | http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/6366 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |