Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Terhadap Tagihan Yang Timbul Karena Undang-Undang

Gurning, Dorley Frenly (2025) Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit Terhadap Tagihan Yang Timbul Karena Undang-Undang. S1 thesis, Uiversitas Kristen Indonesia.

	Text (Hal_Judul_Daftar_Isi_Abstrak) HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (2MB)
	Text (BAB_I) BABI.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (351kB)
	Text (BAB_II) BABII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (365kB)
	Text (BAB_III) BABIII.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (356kB)
	Text (BAB_IV) BABIV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (8MB)
	Text (BAB_V) BABV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)
	Text (Daftar_Pustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (1MB)

Abstract

Asas erga omnes dalam kepailitan membawa implikasi putusan tersebut bersifat final dan mengikat bagi semua pihak, termasuk di luar pihak-pihak yang beracara. Untuk menjamin terpenuhinya asas pelindungan hukum dan kepastian hukum, Undang-undang Nomor 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Kewajiban Penundaan Pembayaran Utang mengatur bahwa putusan pailit harus diumumkan sesuai asas promulgatie. Asas ini memberikan tiga tugas utama kepada kurator yaitu: 1) mengumumkan putusan pailit sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 15 ayat (4) UU KPKPU; 2) melakukan pemberitahuan kepada kreditor sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 86 ayat (3); dan 3) mengumumkan dalam surat kabar sebagaimana ketentuan dalam Pasal 15 UU KPKPU. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Sumber hukum utama yang digunakan meliputi Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan PKPU (UU No. 37/2004), putusan pengadilan yang terkait dengan perkara tersebut, yaitu Putusan No. 04/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023//PN.Niaga MDN. No. 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn serta literatur hukum sekunder. PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada merupakan sebuah badan hukum yang diputus pailit berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Mdn KLHK. Dalam Putusan a quo, Majelis Hakim menimbang bahwa KLHK termasuk kreditor yang memiliki piutang dengan bukti berupa Putusan-putusan Pengadilan yang sudah inkracht van gewijsde. Namun, setelah putusan pailit, Tim Kurator PT RKK tidak memberitahukan kepada KLHK mengenai pailitnya debitornya sesuai dengan UU Kepailitan dan PKPU. Atas tindakan Tim Kurator, KLHK mengajukan permohonan renvoi terhadap kepailitan PT RKK. Tulisan ini akan menganalisis mengenai hak KLHK sebagai kreditor dari PT RKK dan upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh KLHK. Selain itu, akan dianalisis pula pemenuhan asas kepastian hukum dan pelindungan hukum dalam Nomor 4/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2023/PN Niaga Mdn dan Putusan Nomor 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn. / The principle of erga omnes in bankruptcy implies that the decision is final and binding for all parties, including those outside the parties. To ensure the fulfillment of the principle of legal protection and legal certainty, Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Debt Payment Postponement Obligations regulates that bankruptcy decisions must be announced in accordance with the promulgation principle. This principle gives three main tasks to the curator, namely: 1) announce the bankruptcy decision as stipulated in Article 15 paragraph (4) of the KPKPU Law; 2) notify creditors as stipulated in Article 86 paragraph (3); and 3) publish in newspapers as stipulated in Article 15 of the KPKPU Law. This research uses normative juridical legal research methodology with a case study approach. The main legal sources used include the KPKPU Law (Law No. 37/2004), court decisions related to the case, namely Decision No. 04/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2023/PN.Niaga MDN. No. 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn as well as secondary legal literature. PT Ricky Kurniawan Kertapersada is a legal entity that was declared bankrupt based on Decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2023/PN Niaga Mdn KLHK. In the Decision, the Panel of Judges considered that KLHK is a creditor with receivables with evidence in the form of Court Decisions that have been inkracht van gewijsde. However, after the bankruptcy verdict, the Curator Team of PT RKK did not notify KLHK of the bankruptcy of its debtors in accordance with the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law. Due to the actions of the Curator Team, KLHK filed a renvoi application against the bankruptcy of PT RKK. This paper will analyze the rights of KLHK as a creditor of PT RKK and legal efforts that can be made by KLHK. In addition, it will also analyze the fulfillment of the principles of legal certainty and legal protection in Decision Number 4/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2023/PN Niaga Mdn and Decision Number 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn.

Actions (login required)

View Item