Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Secara Lisan Saat Terjadi Ingkar Janji (Wanprestasi) (STUDI KASUS : Putusan .Nomor : 16 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN BJN)

Rumapea, Suryanata (2019) Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Secara Lisan Saat Terjadi Ingkar Janji (Wanprestasi) (STUDI KASUS : Putusan .Nomor : 16 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN BJN). S1 thesis, Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

[img]
Preview
Text
Hal_Judul_Abstrak_Daftar_Isi.pdf

Download (646kB) | Preview
[img] Text
BAB_I.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (576kB)
[img] Text
BAB_II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (499kB)
[img] Text
BAB_III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (434kB)
[img] Text
BAB_IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (341kB)
[img] Text
BAB_V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (201kB)

Abstract

Perjanjian yang dibuat secara lisan memiliki kerancuan dalam menentukan kekuatan hukumnya. Oleh sebab itu dibuat Rumusan masalah dalam skripsi ini adalah bagaimanakah kekuatan hukum perjanjian secara lisan dan bagaimanakah pembuktian suatu perjanjian secara lisan? (studi kasus : Putusan Nomor : 16 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN BJN) Dalam penulisan ini digunakan metode penulisan berdasarkan studi kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif, dengan data primair dari undang-undang dan data sekunder yang didapatkan melalui studi dokumen diantaranya melalui studi putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menujukan bahwa perjanjian secara lisan berkekuatan hukum karena memenuhu syarat sah subjektif perjanjian yang diatur dalam pasal 1320 KUH Perdata dan ketentuan dalam pasal 1338 KUH Perdata, Majelis Hakim yang memutus dan memeriksa perkara Nomor : 16 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN BJN dilakukan dengan cara menggunakan keyakinan hakim dan keterangan dari saksi yang melihat, mendengar dan merasakan langsung. Hasil analisis bahwa perjanjian secara lisan sah dan berkekuatan hukum. Diharapkan kepada para pihak yang hendak membuat perjanjian dilakukan secara tertulis. Kata kunci : Perjanjian Secara Lisan, Wanprestasi Agreements made orally have confusion in determining whether this agreement is legally binding or not, this is because this agreement is difficult to prove, in the Civil Code book III also does not explain how the form of the agreement is legal, but only the legal terms of an agreement . The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how is the legal power of the agreement verbally and how is the proof of an agreement verbally? (case study: Decision Number: 16 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN BJN) In this writing the writing method is used based on normative juridical literature studies, with primary data from laws and secondary data obtained through document studies including through the study of court decisions. The results of the study indicate that the verbal agreement has a legal effect because it fulfills the legitimate subjective conditions of the agreement stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, the Panel of Judges who decide and examine cases Number: 16 / Pdt.G / 2011 / PN BJN is carried out by using statements from witnesses who see, hear and feel immediately. The results of the analysis are verbal and legal agreements. It is expected that the parties who wish to enter into an agreement are made in writing. Keywords :Perjanjian Secara Lisan, Wanprestasi

Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Subjects: LAW > Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform law > Private law
Divisions: FAKULTAS HUKUM > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User: Ms Sari Mentari Simanjuntak
Date Deposited: 18 Dec 2019 08:46
Last Modified: 18 Dec 2019 08:46
URI: http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/1070

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item